Hanks URQ 2.6L Autopsy

a_CQ · Post by **a_CQ** » Tue Jul 19, 2011 7:59 am

That motor will be nice when it's done...

cuatrokoop · Post by **cuatrokoop** » Tue Jul 19, 2011 2:04 pm

Agree, Petar...

my2000apb · Post by **my2000apb** » Tue Jul 19, 2011 2:08 pm

a_CQ wrote:That motor will be nice when it's done...

yeah duh! thanks capt. understatment

haha jk

hank makes a lot of beautiful stuff, im sure the new lump will be mucho sexy as well

RSCoupe · Post by **RSCoupe** » Wed Jul 20, 2011 9:17 am

Wow, that's rough, but it's not true progress without a setback or two.
Keep up the great work. I'm looking forward to the 2.6L!

I'm surprised you didn't hear that valve head banging around in there...

Audilard · Post by **Audilard** » Wed Jul 20, 2011 9:37 am

RSCoupe wrote: I'm looking forward to the 2.6L!

I saw it being worked on last night.

Dave · Post by **Dave** » Wed Jul 20, 2011 9:38 am

and you didn't call?

my2000apb · Post by **my2000apb** » Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:25 am

PICS!!!!

Audilard · Post by **Audilard** » Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:59 am

Hybrid_Hatch wrote:and you didn't call?

I thought you lived at the Lab and were always there...

my2000apb wrote:PICS!!!!

I signed a waiver, went through a security scanner and had to leave all cameras outside the Lab. Sorry. The prototype is impressive. Lofty hp and tq goals with a low rpm threshold. Discussing "the kit" that will be available got the wheels turning inside my head. Resistance is futile.

Imagine...2.6 liter 5 cylinder with a billet wheel 30r...25 psi at 3300 rpms....or sooner....400whp, 400+tq....

Hank is the devil.

my2000apb · Post by **my2000apb** » Wed Jul 20, 2011 12:07 pm

darin, jsut go for a drive and be happy!!! haah

hahaha @ security, im sure there will be a grand unveiling

2.6L 5 cyl with a billet wheel , and it comes 3" vband .82 ar (which is great for more testing)

from ForcedPerformance website
"This turbocharger is recommended for applications running 40psi boost pressure that target the 800-900whp range. The FP HTA™ GT3794R has exceeded 900whp easily during testing as well has running 8's in the quarter mile with trap speeds in excess of 160mph."

http://store.forcedperformance.net/merc ... e=Turbo-FP

a_CQ · Post by **a_CQ** » Wed Jul 20, 2011 12:10 pm

yeah duh! thanks capt. understatment

I just know since I'm supplying him with a block...and there goes my plan for a monster turbo build! :lol:

I saw it being worked on last night.

how is that? The block is just leaving Chicago today?? But I hear this may be the fastest big BIG power build in a while...

Audilard · Post by **Audilard** » Wed Jul 20, 2011 12:14 pm

a_CQ wrote:how is that? The block is just leaving Chicago today?? But I hear this may be the fastest big BIG power build in a while...

Which block are you sending him?

my2000apb · Post by **my2000apb** » Wed Jul 20, 2011 12:20 pm

Audilard wrote:
a_CQ wrote:how is that? The block is just leaving Chicago today?? But I hear this may be the fastest big BIG power build in a while...

Which block are you sending him?

dont forget about the waiver

Audilard · Post by **Audilard** » Wed Jul 20, 2011 12:39 pm

my2000apb wrote:
Audilard wrote:
a_CQ wrote:how is that? The block is just leaving Chicago today?? But I hear this may be the fastest big BIG power build in a while...

Which block are you sending him?

dont forget about the waiver

I'm not sure what I can and can't discuss under the confidentiality agreement.

my2000apb · Post by **my2000apb** » Wed Jul 20, 2011 1:14 pm

is there an attorney in the house?

RSCoupe · Post by **RSCoupe** » Wed Jul 20, 2011 1:39 pm

my2000apb wrote:is there an attorney in the house?

Right here! Just tell me everything, and I'll tell you what can and can't be talked about. :wink:

Post by **Hank** » Wed Jul 20, 2011 1:54 pm

LOL. You guys are too much. Tim, unfortunately, the 37r does not come with a tial Vband inlet option. That is okay, as I am not willing to go any bigger of a turbo for road racing. That is really what I want the car to double up as. My goal for the project is 700whp/700Wtq, and I think the 3586r will get me there with e85. I need/want at least 4000 rpm of meaty power without going dry sump. I am hoping that the extra 350cc of displacement will get me 500whp from 4000-8500 with 700 available at 6500-8500. The 3586r is supposively within 150rpm of hta3582r spool, so if I can gain 400rpm with the extra displacement, I can lose 150 and end up at around 3900rpm with spool up.

8)

I am thinking of building a new manifold though that uses the larger 42r style tial inlet so that I can have the option of having a dyno queen for product developement. Realistically, 700whp is enough, even for me. Famous last words.

Audilard · Post by **Audilard** » Wed Jul 20, 2011 2:21 pm

ShavedQuattro wrote: Realistically, 700whp is enough, even for me. Famous last words.

July 20th. 1:54 p.m. Let it be written....Let it be..

my2000apb · Post by **my2000apb** » Wed Jul 20, 2011 2:31 pm

ah i see, its jsut vband out, weak, it will be out at some point im sure

but the powerband argument wins all day
keep it lower and w/o drysump makes it much more attainable

i cant wait to see more

psychorallyfreak · Post by **psychorallyfreak** » Wed Jul 20, 2011 2:38 pm

RSCoupe wrote:
my2000apb wrote:is there an attorney in the house?

Right here! Just tell me everything, and I'll tell you what can and can't be talked about. :wink:

Yep, sounds like something a lawyer would say...

speeding-g60 · Post by **speeding-g60** » Wed Jul 20, 2011 4:19 pm

RSCoupe wrote:
my2000apb wrote:is there an attorney in the house?

Right here! Just tell me everything, and I'll tell you what can and can't be talked about. :wink:

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA.....

fasterthenrs2 · Post by **fasterthenrs2** » Wed Jul 20, 2011 4:33 pm

700whp 700 wtq damn that will be a task

loxxrider · Post by **loxxrider** » Wed Jul 20, 2011 5:52 pm

^^^ thats for damn sure

PRA4WX · Post by **PRA4WX** » Wed Jul 20, 2011 9:07 pm

All this stroker talk...couldn't help it:

When i introduced it to the Pale Horse it peed on the floor?!

Post by **Hank** » Wed Jul 20, 2011 9:45 pm

Nice!!

Post by **Hank** » Fri Jul 22, 2011 10:00 pm

That is what the inside of the valve looks like.

Looks like the tial hotside took a beating as well. Hopefully I can save it... after two full days in acid, the aluminum us almost all eaten away. Hopefully I can chip out the welded crap in there and weld some areas to get my .82 back. As it stands, the housing is more like a .95!

Hanks URQ 2.6L Autopsy

Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno 612whp 527wtq

Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno 612whp 527wtq

Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno 612whp 527wtq

Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno 612whp 527wtq

Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno 612whp 527wtq

Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno 612whp 527wtq

Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno 612whp 527wtq

Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno 612whp 527wtq

Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno 612whp 527wtq

Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno 612whp 527wtq

Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno 612whp 527wtq

Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno 612whp 527wtq

Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno 612whp 527wtq

Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno 612whp 527wtq

Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno 612whp 527wtq

Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno 612whp 527wtq

Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno 612whp 527wtq

Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno 612whp 527wtq

Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno 612whp 527wtq

Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno 612whp 527wtq

Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno 612whp 527wtq

Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno 612whp 527wtq

Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno 612whp 527wtq

Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno 612whp 527wtq

Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno 612whp 527wtq