Hanks URQ 2.6L Autopsy

death 4kqt · Post by **death 4kqt** » Mon Jan 31, 2011 2:11 pm

what a beast!! nice hank!

Audilard · Post by **Audilard** » Mon Jan 31, 2011 2:58 pm

ShavedQuattro wrote:I hate to break your spirits, but that ride was probably more like 400whp. It was 460whp when we started, and it felt faster than our little meet up a few months back. Perhaps we should run on 114th once more.

Name the date. Although it's not good for my decision making capabilities.

Frank the quattro tank · Mon Jan 31, 2011 3:30 pm

ShavedQuattro wrote:Can a guy calculate his target A/F ratio's based on the measured ethenol content without having a whole dyno room full of birds making fun of him !! Heckle here, heckle there. Shhhheshhh..

What's the formula for that? Seeing as I live in the corn belt, it might be handy to know...

Mcstiff · Post by **Mcstiff** » Mon Jan 31, 2011 3:31 pm

ShavedQuattro wrote:Can a guy calculate his target A/F ratio's based on the measured ethenol content without having a whole dyno room full of birds making fun of him !!

This is why I want to stick with lambda across the board.

a_CQ · Post by **a_CQ** » Mon Jan 31, 2011 3:44 pm

Dave, I believe Hank was calculating how much HP he needs to produce in order to try and keep up with me on the track. Something about the factor of 2 comes to mind. Ti-85 IS needed for this complex calculation.

bimmerboy · Post by **bimmerboy** » Mon Jan 31, 2011 3:47 pm

Jeez a Ti-85?! This guy has all the toys...poor me only has a Ti-83 Plus.

loxxrider · Post by **loxxrider** » Mon Jan 31, 2011 3:50 pm

Ti-85? puh

what you know about a ti-89

dwalmop · Post by **dwalmop** » Mon Jan 31, 2011 4:04 pm

I love my TI-85! I seriously thought I was the only person in the world who still used one.

Post by **Hank** » Mon Jan 31, 2011 4:06 pm

LOL, thats my backpack model, and it is a ti-83+. I do have a ti89, but it stays in my locker at school.

PRA4WX · Post by **PRA4WX** » Mon Jan 31, 2011 5:32 pm

Congrats, buddy! 8-)

audifreakjim · Post by **audifreakjim** » Mon Jan 31, 2011 5:55 pm

Hybrid_Hatch wrote:Dyno time is Serious business. Just check out that ti-85

AHHhaha

That dyno needs a kick in the ass, it sounds like you still crushed it based on the other pulls.

bimmerboy · Post by **bimmerboy** » Mon Jan 31, 2011 6:00 pm

oh sheeet, the Tee Eye eighty nine, wit the algebra computa system. I needa get me one o dem so I can find x mo easier.

123quattro · Post by **123quattro** » Mon Jan 31, 2011 6:03 pm

dwalmop wrote:I love my TI-85! I seriously thought I was the only person in the world who still used one.

Heck no. My wife and I both have one. Mine has been on my desk at work since the day I left school.

Nice numbers.

ralleyquattro · Post by **ralleyquattro** » Tue Feb 01, 2011 7:12 am

I still have my HP48..

WOMBAT · Post by **WOMBAT** » Tue Feb 01, 2011 9:52 am

That's no normal Ti-83+.... it's the silver edition!!

Impressive results Hank! Almost time for me to get that intake in 8)

cuatrokoop · Post by **cuatrokoop** » Tue Feb 01, 2011 9:56 am

loxxrider wrote:Ti-85? puh

what you know about a ti-89

Ti-92 is what he needs, qwerty keyboard and all. I still have mine...

Hapster · Post by **Hapster** » Tue Feb 01, 2011 10:01 am

You guys are just a bunch of punks wit dem new fangled Ti-whatchamakalitz. Takes a real man to handle a K&E!!!

Hap, with some kind of K&E memories near Everboost, Maguire

TheArchitect · Post by **TheArchitect** » Tue Feb 01, 2011 11:55 am

Hapster wrote:You guys are just a bunch of punks wit dem new fangled Ti-whatchamakalitz. Takes a real man to handle a K&E!!!

Hap, with some kind of K&E memories near Everboost, Maguire

Is that a slide rule or an abacus?

Mcstiff · Post by **Mcstiff** » Tue Feb 01, 2011 12:20 pm

JonathanL · Post by **JonathanL** » Tue Feb 01, 2011 4:31 pm

Hey Hank is there any other pics of your re upholstered seats? I saw them a little in the dyno pics.. care to put up some others?

Post by **Hank** » Tue Feb 01, 2011 6:32 pm

Nate, that app is awesome!!! If only I could take an iphone into the testing center....

Jonathan, my seats are not reupolstered. They are just standard urs6 seats transfered over to the URQ seats. I dropped the inserts back an inch on both the bottoms and tops in order to get more of a bucket, and a tad lower seat position. They are also manual seats now with the flip forward feature.

I'll snap some pictures when I get a chance.

Kellen got his first ride in the URQ today. Little boy was out in about 5 minutes... It is 10x more vibration than his vibration chair. I think the drone just lulls him to sleep. lol

Mcstiff · Post by **Mcstiff** » Tue Feb 01, 2011 6:40 pm

ShavedQuattro wrote:Jonathan, my seats are not reupolstered. They are just standard urs6 seats transfered over to the URQ seats. I dropped the inserts back an inch on both the bottoms and tops in order to get more of a bucket, and a tad lower seat position. They are also manual seats now with the flip forward feature.

Foam on the frame or frame on the mounting base?

Post by **Hank** » Tue Feb 01, 2011 6:56 pm

No URQ foam remains. The foam is all urS6, and the bases are all URQ. Doing it this way drops the seat about an inch, as the URs6 foam is much thinner than the URQ foam

HTH

Dave · Post by **Dave** » Tue Feb 01, 2011 8:17 pm

Ha nice work, now you can tell your wife you need to go for a ride to put the little guy to sleep!

Post by **Hank** » Tue Feb 01, 2011 8:28 pm

Only problem is that the guy still faces backwards, so acceleration of the URQ is too much for his little neck.

Hanks URQ 2.6L Autopsy

Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno'd

Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno'd

Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno'd

Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno'd

Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno'd

Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno'd

Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno'd

Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno'd

Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno'd

Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno'd

Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno'd

Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno'd

Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno'd

Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno'd

Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno'd

Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno'd

Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno'd

Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno'd

Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno'd

Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno'd

Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno'd

Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno'd

Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno'd

Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno'd

Re: Hanks 81 URQ Dyno'd