Page 2 of 2

Re: Coilover question: spring rates

Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2015 5:47 am
by loxxrider
Lol damn sorry that's what I meant haha. At least I had it right for the application at hand :)

Re: Coilover question: spring rates

Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2015 8:20 am
by EDIGREG
All true but progressive rate setups can be great for street cars. Just use a softer spring coupled with a stiff one, so that you have the effective combined rate for comfort under most driving scenarios, but when cornering, the softer spring is fully compressed/dead and only the stiff spring is utilized - best of both worlds.

Re: Coilover question: spring rates

Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2015 8:35 am
by mushasho
EDIGREG wrote:All true but progressive rate setups can be great for street cars. Just use a softer spring coupled with a stiff one, so that you have the effective combined rate for comfort under most driving scenarios, but when cornering, the softer spring is fully compressed/dead and only the stiff spring is utilized - best of both worlds.


So in this example using a soft linear helper spring and an even firmer linear main spring would equal a progressive rate... ?


Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk

Re: Coilover question: spring rates

Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2015 8:44 am
by loxxrider
Yeah, what ed said is exactly how you make it progressive.

Re: Coilover question: spring rates

Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2015 5:57 pm
by mushasho
loxxrider wrote:Yeah, what ed said is exactly how you make it progressive.


So technically anyone who's used a linear 150lb tender spring in conjunction say linear 500lb main spring, effectively have something near an H&R Race spring... hmmm... which is compatible with a Bilstien Sport strut

Like these

Image

Re: Coilover question: spring rates

Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2015 9:41 pm
by loxxrider
Yeah, but when the small spring is fully compressed, the 500 lb will kick in and work that strut hard. That's when it counts for strut wear, so you still need custom valving in my opinion.

Re: Coilover question: spring rates

Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2015 9:43 pm
by paradox11235
Anyone not happy with their rates? I need another pair of used springs...

Re: Coilover question: spring rates

Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2015 10:10 pm
by loxxrider
Also, that spring rate would be 115 until the lower rate spring collapses.

Re: Coilover question: spring rates

Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2015 10:36 pm
by EDIGREG
The 150lb spring would never not be collapsed. I ran 250lb tender springs and they were fully compressed/dead under static vehicle weight. The advantage is that they soften the compression following a rebound event (ie hitting a pothole). They also serve as helper springs to prevent the primary springs from being unseated. If you want a truly progressive setup you're going to need a stiffer secondary spring.

Re: Coilover question: spring rates

Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2015 11:22 pm
by ringbearer
paradox11235 wrote:Anyone not happy with their rates? I need another pair of used springs...



I still have a pair of Eibach barrels in 380, PM me an offer if you want them.

Re: Coilover question: spring rates

Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2015 11:33 pm
by mushasho
ringbearer wrote:
paradox11235 wrote:Anyone not happy with their rates? I need another pair of used springs...



I still have a pair of Eibach barrels in 380, PM me an offer if you want them.



If I match those with 550lb tenders... I know it'll be inverse, but...

Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk

Re: Coilover question: spring rates

Posted: Sat Jun 06, 2015 10:10 am
by ringbearer
You want the softer spring to be the short one so that it will.compress and then you will.get the stiffer rate of the main spring.

Re: Coilover question: spring rates

Posted: Sat Jun 06, 2015 4:13 pm
by loxxrider
ringbearer wrote:You want the softer spring to be the short one so that it will.compress and then you will.get the stiffer rate of the main spring.



Yep

Re: Coilover question: spring rates

Posted: Wed Jun 17, 2015 4:45 pm
by mushasho
So in keeping with the rate discussion...

Here we have a box...
a box full of different coil springs...

Using what we see here, what would be the optimal setup for the street? I already have a HAP Rear Sway Bar set on the softest setting in the rear...

Pick & Choose as You'd like...

Top are Eibach 250-550 tender springs
Bottom Left Eibach 8" 475lb
Bottom Right Eibach 7" 350lb

Image

Re: Coilover question: spring rates

Posted: Wed Jun 17, 2015 5:38 pm
by loxxrider
So the tenders are progressive?

I think with those tenders you're going to need shorter main springs. I predict that that'd make for a setup that would absorb 1-2" bumps really nicely, then firm up on bumps bigger than that. The only downside would probably be a bit more body roll than you would have with straight main springs, but that could be alleviated with sway bars... That's just my initial guess at the situation without any kind of analysis or calculations.

Re: Coilover question: spring rates

Posted: Wed Jun 17, 2015 5:41 pm
by mushasho
loxxrider wrote:So the tenders are progressive?

I think with those tenders you're going to need shorter main springs. I predict that that'd make for a setup that would absorb 1-2" bumps really nicely, then firm up on bumps bigger than that. The only downside would probably be a bit more body roll than you would have with straight main springs, but that could be alleviated with sway bars... That's just my initial guess at the situation without any kind of analysis or calculations.


How about just eliminate the tender all together... Straight single coil setup...
Which Up Front & Which Out back?

Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk

Re: Coilover question: spring rates

Posted: Wed Jun 17, 2015 6:04 pm
by loxxrider
Longer and stronger out back ;)

Re: Coilover question: spring rates

Posted: Wed Jun 17, 2015 6:16 pm
by mushasho
loxxrider wrote:Longer and stronger out back ;)


We just love oversteer huh...

Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk

Re: Coilover question: spring rates

Posted: Wed Jun 17, 2015 6:36 pm
by ringbearer
How much room will you have around the gland nut? People have had rubbing issues.