Page 23 of 28

Re: Pops' 1997 S6 2.5L Stroker - moving forward

Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 12:44 am
by pkw
i have said it before but i am not a fan of those valves. they may lower boost threshold but i think it if for the wrong reasons and a flat wall in the exhaust stream can be very bad. i think that the bad outweighs the good.

Re: Pops' 1997 S6 2.5L Stroker - moving forward

Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 3:32 am
by chaloux
Eh, we're not too concerned. Blowing up motors makes you learn :) It's what happens when you have to be the guinea pig. When you think about how it works, running with the QSV closed should only ever happen at low rpm where backpressure isn't an issue (and perhaps once on the dyno to show the difference). By the time you get to that point it should be open. Unfortunately it took us a long time to tune it and therefore would have had repeated WOT to redline pulls with it closed = not good. Plus there was a little while there where we didn't have the 044 in and the car was running lean.

In short, when working PROPERLY, this should not happen. There are 1100whp Supras that don't have this issue beacuse they were setup properly from the start.

Re: Pops' 1997 S6 2.5L Stroker - moving forward

Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 4:32 pm
by Draky
chaloux wrote:There are 1100whp Supras that don't have this issue because they were setup properly from the start.

Very true ... remember, properly does involve the right amount of $$ ... I want to set up my car for 300 AWHP but I don't have the $$ for it so it's not going to happen anytime soon.

Marcel's "The Stove"

Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2012 7:15 pm
by fastscirocco
Marcel, I think you should christen your car "The Stove", cause it's black like a cast iron stove,
and your determination is as strong as a cast iron stove!

Re: Pops' 1997 S6 2.5L Stroker - moving forward

Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 2:43 am
by fasterthenrs2
chaloux wrote:Eh, we're not too concerned. Blowing up motors makes you learn :) It's what happens when you have to be the guinea pig. When you think about how it works, running with the QSV closed should only ever happen at low rpm where backpressure isn't an issue (and perhaps once on the dyno to show the difference). By the time you get to that point it should be open. Unfortunately it took us a long time to tune it and therefore would have had repeated WOT to redline pulls with it closed = not good. Plus there was a little while there where we didn't have the 044 in and the car was running lean.

In short, when working PROPERLY, this should not happen. There are 1100whp Supras that don't have this issue beacuse they were setup properly from the start.


With audi 20V 5 cill and power levels you guys r at, you shouldn’t be a guinea pig, those engines has been pushed lots further and they have been melted million times. It is up to you to learn from someone else mistakes (lots cheaper that way) or you can be stubborn and learn the stuff hard way (expensive and time consuming)

Re: Pops' 1997 S6 2.5L Stroker - moving forward

Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 3:55 pm
by chaloux
Well I just mean guinea pig in terms of the QSV is all. But yeah I see your point of learn from others' mistakes. I think when we do this the second time around it will be fine because we'll be running low boost until it's setup right.

Small update in other news... coated rod and main bearings are shipping from Marc tomorrow and we're picking up some inconel .5mm oversized exhaust valves as well. The couple random things I've read about sodium valves lately has kinda been disconcerting. Even though the valves in dad's head are essentially new, it just doesn't seem smart to have them in there waiting to drop at 30psi.

We're waiting on a quote from Dan on the pistons. 9A, 8.1:1 or 8.3:1 comp ratio, 82.5mm, coated tops

We've sourced a 92 EV block, so we'll be picking that up soon as well (next trip south to the big smoke)

Re: Pops' 1997 S6 2.5L Stroker - moving forward

Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 4:37 pm
by chaloux
oh! and I forgot - some CF trim, will definitely help lower weight :P

Re: Pops' 1997 S6 2.5L Stroker - moving forward

Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 3:54 pm
by chaloux
It appears from the invoice that Marc may have sent .5mm over intake and exhaust valves. Whoops! I'll just convince dad it's not worth shipping them back ;)

Re: Pops' 1997 S6 2.5L Stroker - moving forward

Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 6:54 pm
by EDIGREG
"while you're in there" ;)

Re: Pops' 1997 S6 2.5L Stroker - moving forward

Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:18 pm
by UrSobsessed
Darn that Marc! :D

Re: Pops' 1997 S6 2.5L Stroker - moving forward

Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2012 8:14 am
by urs6ville
marc is just thinking ahead ;)

Re: Pops' 1997 S6 2.5L Stroker - moving forward

Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2012 8:24 am
by my2000apb
did you measure them oversize or the invoice may be wrong?

Re: Pops' 1997 S6 2.5L Stroker - moving forward

Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2012 9:04 am
by chaloux
we were going to get .5 over exhaust valves anyway. haven't arrived yet so we can't test yet but I'm assuming that there are intake and exhaust valves there based on the $

Re: Pops' 1997 S6 2.5L Stroker - moving forward

Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2012 10:40 am
by Marc
chaloux wrote:we were going to get .5 over exhaust valves anyway. haven't arrived yet so we can't test yet but I'm assuming that there are intake and exhaust valves there based on the $



nope, the mixup was in the studs, for some reason I thought you wanted head and main studs as well. only exhaust valves in there as you requested. Your dad already emailed me, just bring back the studs and I'll credit the diff.

Re: Pops' 1997 S6 2.5L Stroker - moving forward

Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2012 12:51 pm
by chaloux
dope!

Re: Pops' 1997 S6 2.5L Stroker - moving forward

Posted: Sat Aug 18, 2012 4:04 pm
by chaloux
lalalala

So while waiting for things we do a lot of talking. I think we narrowed down what caused the det that destroyed the motor. It was before we got the 044 pump in there and the car was running lean. A few full throttle runs probably toasted the block early on and then (thanks to the coatings) lasted through while we tuned it but the damage was already done. I am sceptical about it being the QSV closed but that could have played a small part. One thing that Ed said stuck out to me when he was talking about tuning his car with Marc at Carlisle and running out of fuel - "if I was on pump gas, that motor would have now been in pieces" - or something along those lines. We definitely had more than one scary lean situation happen and my feeling is that's what did the motor in. Sad... :(

Anyway pistons are ordered from Wiseco and I think Hank's almost done with the fun v-band->t3 adapter so we'll get rolling on this thing soon! Just gotta finish a TDI first :P

Re: Pops' 1997 S6 2.5L Stroker - moving forward

Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 6:44 pm
by Hank
Image

More to come!!!

Re: Pops' 1997 S6 2.5L Stroker - moving forward

Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 6:48 pm
by ChrisAudi80
That is a beautiful bead...

Re: Pops' 1997 S6 2.5L Stroker - moving forward

Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 7:25 pm
by EDIGREG
w00t. Gonna be sick.

Re: Pops' 1997 S6 2.5L Stroker - moving forward

Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 8:29 pm
by UrSobsessed
Dude can weld.

Re: Pops' 1997 S6 2.5L Stroker - moving forward

Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 9:34 pm
by ringbearer
Stacks of tiny dimes...

Re: Pops' 1997 S6 2.5L Stroker - moving forward

Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 5:13 am
by chaloux
So sexy. one mo

Image

Re: Pops' 1997 S6 2.5L Stroker - moving forward

Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 7:05 am
by audifreakjim
Looking great, the vband adapter kicks ass :)

Re: Pops' 1997 S6 2.5L Stroker - moving forward

Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 9:27 am
by EDIGREG
is it done yet??? :pics: :vids:

Re: Pops' 1997 S6 2.5L Stroker - moving forward

Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 10:23 am
by chaloux
just got the block yesterday! have a shit ton ofstuff coming from hank and pistons should be here in two weeks or so. first up is getting the block for before boring out.

was thinking it'd be cool to test a hta82 and 86 on the dyno back to back with the comp